Who Defines How Foundations Should Change?

Tuesday, October 6, 2009 by Mike Howland

There's no shortage of opinion these days about what foundations should do differently to support nonprofits, which groups they should be funding, and how much they ought to pay out in grants. The commentary ranges from deeply insightful and soul-searching to borderline ludicrous.

This is not an environment that grantmakers have seen before. And while the chorus of columnists and policy wonks is full of suggestions (and in some cases, threats), the reality is that foundation trustees of private foundations, independent foundations, community  foundation and corporate philanthropy have to make their own decisions about how to adapt to, and continue to add value in, a changed world. 

It's not an "ain't nobody's business if I do," situation. Rather we should acknowledge that philanthropy is - and always has been - a personal thing.

I understand this completely, because the Southeastern Council of Foundations, as an association, has had to do the same thing. We recently launched our new strategic plan, and it paints a very new picture of our organization. Our strategic planning committee had to grapple with some tough issues about our relevancy to members and the value we provided. With their guidance, we came out of that discussion on the right path.

Just like our foundation members, we know we can't continue "business as usual," so we've made some changes. We've become more focused on building leadership in the sector, allowing our members to customize their relationship with us and with one another to a more detailed degree. We're also working strategically with other grantmaker organizations as partners.

Simply put, we're giving our members more ways to connect and more to connect to as they make very personal decisions about their grantmaking and their futures.

Luckily for us, the personal and professional relationships that members gain through SECF have retained - and even increased - their value during tough times. Connections, communications and camaraderie are valuable tools when one is struggling with touch choices. SECF is honored to provide those tools.

So, to all of you in the foundation community, I say: Only you can make the decisions about your foundation's operations and future. Don't let anyone tell you any differently. But don't make those decisions in a vacuum. Let your colleagues and friends at SECF know what we can do to help.

And on the same note, I know that growth and change are never really "complete," so I invite you all to take a look at our strategic plan and let us know what you think. 

Michael R. Howland, CAE
President and CEO
Southeastern Council of Foundations

 

Comments for Who Defines How Foundations Should Change?

Monday, October 12, 2009 by Byron Harrell:
Mike is absolutely right about the importance of new communications and the cacophony of individuals and organizations all too willing to lend advice to grantmakers. To me, our success as grantmakers and at SECF depends mightily on having a wide view and adaptive strategies that help us continue to add value to the charitable impulse. Congratulations to SECF on the completion of a very carefully crafted plan that will do just that....keep us relevant in the new (smaller) world.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 by Maggie Osborn:
Thank you to Mike and the SECF Board for recognizing the balance between what is private and what is public in the construction of the new strategic plan. The new world order calls for our transparency and investment in higher standards and better accountability toward the public trust. At the same time we recognize that the power of philanthropy is rooted in the power of individual passions translated into public missions. Our unique personal signature has led to a diversity of causes under a unity of purpose; to make the world better and to denmonstrate love for our fellow human beings. That having been said we are called upon to strengthen the leadership of the sector so that personal resources may be brought to bare on the world's greatest challenges. Also critical is the realization that our resources are not only monetary but the skills and knowledge we have acquired and continue to develop through our partners that we invest in the public arena through advocacy and sytem change. Let us continue to humbly celebrate our individual strengths while maximizing our public leadership.

Leave a comment





Captcha